data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ca6e/3ca6e2c1889a6d49af6f2968defe0a7ba9b4ad21" alt=""
BLOG
BLOG
Cybersecurity incidents aren’t rare for businesses now. In the first 6 months of 2021, around 1767 data breach incidents rocked the business world and exposed more than 18 billion records. And one of the hardest-hit industry verticals from threatening cyber-attacks is the financial industry.
As per research conducted by ImmuniWeb, more than 98% of the top-notch fintech businesses are vulnerable to severe cyberattacks, including app security attacks on mobile and web, ransomware, and phishing, among others.
One of the easiest ways to make financial service providers accountable for their security posture is through cybersecurity regulations. Compliance with cybersecurity regulations means businesses will align with the key security requirements and be less vulnerable to security incidents.
However, complying with the right cybersecurity regulations is not as easy as anticipated because of the underlying challenges and intricate details. And that is why it becomes challenging for businesses to stick to stringent cybersecurity regulations and avoid serious outcomes.
In this blog, we will demystify the world of cybersecurity regulations for your better understanding and highlight the top regulations and the associated best practices necessary for the financial services industry.
Financial cybersecurity compliance refers to the security regulations implemented by financial institutions to prevent data breaches and maintain a strong security posture. The term also aligns with the adherence to laws and security regulations, providing the minimal standard for data protection within the financial industry.
Governments or administrative security authorities create these regulations, and their implementation has an impact on the whole financial services business, including:
One of the most significant issues impacting cybersecurity compliance in the financial industry is the variety of security standards and the significant overlaps between them, which is to be expected in the case of the most strictly regulated industries of all - the financial services industry. This problem can be overcome by focusing solely on the regulations required for financial institutions and avoiding the optional ones.
The advantage of continuing to implement optional regulatory standards is that installing their security safeguards may reduce cybersecurity risks even further. Keeping all of this in mind, we have compiled a list of the top 7 cybersecurity regulations financial services companies must adhere to. The regulations listed below promote customer data security and data breach resistance.
PCI DSS or the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standards (DSS) is a set of security standards developed by the Payment Card Industry (PCI) to reduce credit card fraud and secure the sensitive information of credit cardholders.
Credit card firms must comply with PCI DSS to protect the security of credit card transactions. The technical and operational standards that organizations need to follow to secure credit card data provided by cardholders and sent through card processing activities are developed and managed by the PCI Security Standards Council.
PCI DSS should be followed by all organizations that receive or process customer credit card information, including retailers and payment solution providers.
The most essential criterion of PCI compliance is that a company must secure other people's payment information as carefully as they would their own. Risks such as accidentally broadcasting credit card information or misplacing papers containing customer personal information cannot be taken.
Every firm must safeguard its clients' transaction history, account information, and personal information. PCI DSS compliance requirements assist firms in adhering to these cautious business practices and ensuring their customers are protected to the greatest extent possible.
The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act was passed by the United States Congress in 2002 to safeguard investors against financial fraud. Through internal checks, the SOX framework provides recommended security procedures for avoiding fraudulent financial activities.
SOX has recently expanded into more than merely a framework for assuring the sanctity of financial records. It now contains cybersecurity components to guarantee financial institutions are prepared to deal with frequent cybersecurity threats that could disrupt financial transactions.
SOX compliance is essential for all publicly listed businesses, including those in the financial sector.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act's provisions cover corporate governance and financial transparency for both U.S. and non-U.S.-based businesses. This act mandates that all financial reports include an Internal Controls Report, accurately representing a company's financial facts. During the auditing of section 404, an auditor at SoX must undertake a comprehensive review of policies, controls, and procedures and ensure that internal controls and processes can be audited using a control framework.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is the US version of the International Institution for Standardization (ISO), an international organization regulating national standards organizations. Like the ISO, NIST provides a wide range of information security requirements, including cybersecurity compliance, addressed in NIST document 800-53.
Originally, NIST 800-53 only applied to federal and government institutions, but the publication's most recent modification, revision 5, expanded its scope to include non-government entities. NIST 800-53 revision 5 contains a single set of controls to facilitate harmonizing numerous standards and a stronger emphasis on data security than in prior revisions.
Compliance with NIST is mandatory for all US federal entities and their contractors. Also, complying with NIST is voluntary for private sector businesses, including financial service providers.
NIST has designed a list of 110 requirements that address several aspects of an organization's IT technology, procedures, and policies. Access control, system configuration, and authentication methods are all covered in these requirements. They also specify cybersecurity protocols and incident response plans.
Each requirement addresses a cybersecurity vulnerability or improves a network component, and it comes with extensive 'explanation' text that helps the company comprehend the requirement's larger context. The implementation of each of these requirements ensures that an organization’s network, systems, and employees are all effectively ready to handle any Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) securely.
ISO/IEC 27001 is a widely accepted worldwide standard for lowering security risks and safeguarding information systems. ISO/IEC 27001 is an internationally recognized set of security policies and processes that provide direction on improving a company's security posture in any industry.
Financial institutions that want to demonstrate their exceptional cybersecurity procedures to stakeholders should pursue ISO/IEC 27001 accreditation, given its image as an internationally recognized benchmark for cyber attack resilience.
In most countries, ISO 27001 is not mandatory. However, it is highly recommended for businesses in the financial services sector due to the framework's superior protection of sensitive data. ISO 27001 certification can also be used to demonstrate cybersecurity due diligence in other highly regulated areas, such as healthcare.
Nevertheless, financial service businesses that do not intend to pursue ISO 27001 certification can strengthen their cybersecurity by following the framework's list of domains and controls. Certification is only suggested if a business wants to present proof of ISO/IEC 27001 compliance publicly.
The other significant benefit of adhering to this framework is that it would also assist your business with GDPR compliance when implemented along with an Information Security Management System (ISMS).
When adopting ISO/IEC 27001, the two most significant actions are scoping your ISMS (defining what information needs to be protected), completing a risk assessment, and creating a risk treatment methodology (identifying threats to your information). The following obligatory clauses must also be completed by organizations:
The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (EU-GDPR) is a security framework meant to prevent citizens' personal data from being compromised.
The GDPR applies to all enterprises that process data about EU individuals manually or through automated processes. The GDPR highlights different security guidelines for data processors and controllers to secure the entire lifecycle of user data.
The following are some examples of personal data that are highly prioritized for protection under GDPR:
Yes. The EU requires GDPR compliance for financial services that collect or process personal data from EU residents, regardless of the business's location.
Even if the company's headquarters are in the United States, a company offering a SaaS service to a worldwide customer base - including Europe - would be required to comply with the GDPR.
GDPR compliance is a key issue for 92 % of US businesses, according to a PwC poll.
Companies must take appropriate data protection measures to protect consumers' personal data and privacy from loss or exposure, according to the GDPR. The most significant principles and requirements governing the management of personal data are summarised in Article 5 of the GDPR:
Financial institutions are required by the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA) to secure consumer data and to fully disclose all data-sharing practices to clients. Financial institutions must create security controls to protect client information from any occurrences that risk data integrity and safety under this US statute. This includes stringent financial information access rules to reduce the chances of unwanted access and compromise.
Yes. All businesses selling financial products or services in the United States must comply with the GLBA. The following financial entities are required to comply with GLBA:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act established numerous fundamental guidelines for collecting, disclosing, and protecting nonpublic personal information or personally identifiable information held by consumers (PII). The two major requirements associated with the act are:
This rule compels financial institutions to give each customer privacy notice at the start of the relationship and every year after that. The privacy notice must clarify what information is gathered about the customer, where that information is shared, how it is used, and how it is safeguarded.
The notice should also incorporate the consumer's rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act to opt out of sharing their personal information with unaffiliated third parties. Unaffiliated parties who receive non-public information should be bound by the consumer's original relationship agreement's acceptance terms.
The Safeguards Rule mandates that financial institutions create a written information security plan outlining their methods and procedures for safeguarding clients' NPI. Covered entities must conduct a thorough risk analysis of each department that handles nonpublic information and establish, monitor, and test a program to protect the data.
If the way data is gathered, kept, and used changes, the protections must also be changed. The federal government has established a set of guidelines for protecting client information.
The Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD 2) is a European Union directive that promotes competition in the banking sector. PSD-2 is a financial data security standard developed by the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).
PSD 2 comprises standards for securing online payments, strengthening customer data security, and strong client authentication to ensure that banking transactions in the EU are secure (e.g., multi-factor authentication).
Yes. The PSD 2 directives apply to all banks and financial institutions in the European Union. Non-compliance with PSD 2 can result in a fine of up to EUR 20.000.000 (about 23 million USD) or 4% of yearly income (whichever is greater).
The PSD 2 regulation requires banks and fintech to share account information only with those third-party service providers (TPPs) with account holders' authorization. Customers will be able to:
Account Servicing Payment Service Providers are financial firms that handle customer accounts under PSD 2 (ASPSPs).
The ASPSPs that manage customer accounts must provide a safe means for Third-Party Payment Providers (TPPs) to access customer information with the customer's authorization. TPPs are divided into two kinds in PSD 2: AISPs and PISPs. Customers can access information from several service providers using AISPs. Customers can make online payments straight from their personal bank accounts via PISPs.
BCG has recently stated in their research that fintech firms are 300 times more likely than other companies to be targeted by threat actors. Moreover, handling the aftermath of those attacks will carry a much higher cost for finance and wealth managers than for any other competing sector.
The situation gets even more complex because of various security controls demanded by different regulations.
However, the most overlapping security controls associated with these regulations can be addressed using the best cybersecurity practices.
Regular Vulnerability Assessments and Penetration Testing can help fintech companies detect and remediate vulnerabilities that could quickly lead to data breaches. Financial services can also use these regular tests to strengthen their security posture and meet most regulations' stringent cyber resilience requirements.
Until proven differently, a zero-trust design thinks all network activity is malicious. This framework promotes more secure privileged access management, making it harder for threat actors to gain access to critical information.
Having an adequately framed Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan in advance can instruct your IT and cybersecurity experts on how to respond to a significant security incident, such as a data breach, data leak, ransomware attack, or loss of critical data.
To prepare your systems for regulation compliance, managing your third-party risks through an efficient TPRM (Third-Party Risk Management) solution is essential. It will secure your entire third-party vendor network by certifying cybersecurity improvements with security ratings and evaluating compliance with security assessments. Advanced TPRM solutions can additionally map security assessment responses to vendor-specific mandated rules to detect flaws that prohibit compliance.
Data leaks hasten data breaches and disclose sensitive information that may violate regulations. That is why encrypting your data beforehand can go a long way. Encryption can address exposures inside and across the vendor network and help avoid regulatory infractions and the penalties that come with them if they go unnoticed.
As a result of an increasing number of cyberattacks mainly aimed at the financial industry, various mandatory cybersecurity legislation has been introduced. Regulatory compliance is one of the most successful ways to hold financial services accountable for their security posture, even though it is typically seen as an unneeded burden on security teams.
Cybersecurity policies must be malleable to stay relevant in a continuously changing threat world. As a result, the financial sector must keep up with changes to existing legislation as well as the introduction of new information security requirements regularly.
We have so many ideas for new features that can help your mobile app security even more efficiently. We promise you that we wont mail bomb you, just once in a month.